Teachers' Perceptions of Implementing the Constructivist Approach: A Case Study of One New Generation School in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
DOI:
10.37985/jer.v7i1.3009Keywords:
Teacher perceptions, Constructivist Approach, constructivist learningAbstract
This research study explored teachers’ perceptions of implementing the constructivist approach and the challenges they faced in applying constructivist learning in the classroom. A qualitative research design was employed, using purposive sampling, with critical case sampling applied to select ten moral and civic subject teachers as participants. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a colour-coding technique to extract key themes. The findings indicated that teachers generally held positive perceptions of constructivist learning within the New Generation School program, recognising its benefits for both teaching and learning. Constructivist educational theory was viewed as advantageous in promoting active learning, student engagement, and critical thinking. However, teachers also encountered challenges in its implementation, such as classroom management and adapting resources. Despite these difficulties, participants demonstrated a strong willingness to apply constructivist approaches and suggested practical solutions. Support from schools, colleagues, and stakeholders served as a motivating force in sustaining the implementation process.
Downloads
References
Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance
academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040211
Alam, M. (2017). Constructivism and the classroom curriculum. International Journal of
Indian Psychology. https://doi.org/10.25215/0501.103
Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences
through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149.https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).11
Attle, S., & Baker, B. (2007). Cooperative learning in a competitive environment:
Classroom applications. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 77-83.
Asrat, D. (2017). The practice and challenges of constructivist teaching approach in
Dangila district second cycle primary schools, Ethiopia. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 19(4), 1–12. Doi: 10.9734/BJESBS/2017/30827
Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a
discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335
Bardakci, S., Cayci, K., Colkesen, A., & Fatih, A. (2021). How to become a constructivist
teacher: The impact of philosophical thoughts on constructivist learning beliefs. Research in Pedagogy, 11(1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2101v214b
Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize
constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist‐teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541–550. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121
Belland, B.R., Kim C-M., & Hannfin, M. J. (2013). A framework designing scaffolds that
improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48, 234-270.
Booth, T. (2014). Applying Constructivist Active Learning Theory in the Creation of
Information Security Hands-on Labs. academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu.html
Buckner, E. S. (2016). The changing discourse on higher education and the nation-state,
1960–2010. Higher Education, 74(3), 473–489.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0056-2
Bybee, R., W. (2000). "Teaching science as inquiry". (Ed. Jim. Minstrell, Emily. H. Van
Zee) Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. s. 20-4, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington.
Bates, E. S. (2014). Sophisticated constructivism in human Rights compliance
theory. European Journal of International Law, 25(4), 1169 1182.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu084
Bharatha, A., Ojeh, N., Fazle Rabbi, A. M., Campbell, M. H., Krishnamurthy, K., Layne-Yarde, R. N.,
Majumder, M. A. A. (2024). Comparing the Performance of ChatGPT-4 and Medical Students on MCQs at Varied Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 15, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S457408
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.
Campbell, T., Zhang, D., & Neilson, D. (2010). Model based inquiry in the high school
physics classroom: An exploratory study of implementation and outcomes.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 258–269. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9251-6
Change, F. C. (2009). How teacher questioning behaviours assist and affect language
teaching and learning in EFL classroom in Taiwan [PhD dissertation]. University of Warwick.
Chandio, M. T., Zafar, N., & Solangi, G. M. (2021). Bloom's Taxonomy: Reforming Pedagogy through
Assessment. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1), 109-140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1308485
Chi, M.T.H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement
active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 47, 177-188.
Chhun, R., & Mok, S. (2024). The teacher’s perspective on effectiveness of mathematics teaching
at primary school in Cambodia. Insight: Cambodia Journal of Basic and Applied Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.61945/cjbar.2024.6.2.05
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Elkind, D. (2004). The problem with constructivism. The Educational Forum, 68(4),
306–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984646
Elliott, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., Littlefield Cook, J. & Travers, J. (2000). Educational
psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.
Ertmer, P. & Newby, T. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing
critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Figueira-Sampaio, A. D. S., dos Santos, E. E. F., & Carrijo, G. A. (2009). A constructivist
computational tool to assist in learning primary school mathematical equations.
Computers &Amp; Education, 53(2), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.012
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. New York:
Sage Publications.
Glasersfeld E. von. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K.
Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student
characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of
constructivism. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782291
Jamaluddin, N. S. (2023). Applicability of Constructivist-Oriented Teaching in the Process of
Educational Transformation in Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 16(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej/Vol.16.1.3.2023
Jemberie, L. W. (2021). Teachers’ perception and implementation of constructivist
learning approaches: Focus on Ethiopian Institute of textile and fashion technology, Bahir Dar. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.1907955
Ke, S., & Neak, P. (2025). Assessing the 21st century learning skills among Cambodian children: A
comparison of state and Muslim religious schools. Asia Social Issues, 18(2), e274062. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2025.274062
Kapekh.org. (2020, November). Constructivist Learning Training Manual.
http://www.kapekh.org/files/report_file/166-en.pdf
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers’
questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604684
Kim, J. (2016). Development of a global lifelong learning index for future education. Asia
Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 439–463.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9445-6
Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: challenges,
concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311
Lai, C. Y., & Wu, C. C. (2006). Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning
environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00176.x
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Students’ conceptions of
constructivist learning in different programme years and different learning environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 501–514.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908x378117
Macdonald, D. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school
curriculum reform movement an anachronism? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 139–149. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210157605
Mcleod, S. (2019) Constructivism as a Theory for Teaching & Learning, In Simple
Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
Mansory, A., & Karlsson, P. (2005). Assessment of teaching practice (pp. 1–39).
Musyrifah, F., Rouzi, K. S., Fathurrohman, R., Saryanto, S., Ismail, F. H., & Andaryati, E. (2025). The
Constructivist Approach in the Implementation of MBKM for Higher Education in the Society 5.0 Era. Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices, 9(1), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseedu.v9i1.10823
Nugroho, K. Y., Anwar, C., & Hartono, H. (2024). Social Constructivist Mentoring Program to
Support Teacher Professional Development: An Action Research Approach. The Qualitative Report, 29(5),1416-1436. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6634
Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college
instructors (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Palmaru R. (2016) Constructivism as a key towards further understanding of
communication, culture and society. Constructivist Foundations 12(1): 30–38. http://constructivist.info/12/1/030
Phillips, (2000). Constructivism in Education. Google Books.
https://books.google.com.kh/books/about/Constructivism_in_Education.html
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and
learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Powell, C. K. & Kalina, J. C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing
tools for an effective classroom, Education 130 (2), 241-250.
Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social Constructivist teaching strategies in the
small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422
Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Shanlax
International Journal of Education, 7(4), 113.
https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational
Research, 56(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004411
Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th ed.). Boston,
MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
Suhendi, A. ., Purwarno, P. ., & Chairani, S. . (2021). Constructivism-Based Teaching and Learning
in Indonesian Education. KnE Social Sciences, 5(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Solomon, M., & Endalew, J. (2015). Teachers’ perception and practice of constructivist
teaching approach: the case of secondary schools of Kamashi Zone. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(4), 194–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/star.v4i4.27
Samoun, S., & Pen, D. (2025). A qualitative study of challenges faced by Cambodian teachers in
implementing student-centered approaches. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 4(2), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i2.426
homson, M. M., & Gregory, B. (2013). Elementary teachers’ classroom practices and
beliefs in relation to US science education reform: Reflections from within. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1800–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.791956
Tuwoso. (2016). The implementation of constructivism approach for physics learning in
vocational high school. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1778, No. 1, p. 030057). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965791
Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach:
constructivist learning in Dewy, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.
Wilder, M., & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). Cell inquiry: a 5e learning cycle lesson. Science
Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 41(4), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.3200/sats.41.4.37-43
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of
dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
Wood, W. B. (2003). Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large
research universities: A perspective on the Boyer commission report. Cell Biology Education, 2(2), 112–116. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-02-0004
Woolfolk, A. (2019). Educational Psychology. Fourteenth Edition. Pearson. Global
edition.
Yilmaz, K. (2011). The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings
and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.568989
Zhu, X., Ennis, C. D., & Chen, A. (2011). Implementation challenges for a constructivist
physical education curriculum. Physical Education &Amp; Sport Pedagogy, 16(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408981003712802
Downloads
Published
Check Article Index
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vibol Onn, Kuen Im

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
