Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Versus Traditional Lectures in Medical Education.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i2.2365Keywords:
Problem-Based Learning, Traditional Lectures, Medical Education, Student Engagement, Curricular Integration, Educational Reform, Self-Directed Learning, Learning OutcomesAbstract
Medical education has evolved significantly to incorporate active learning strategies, with problem-based learning (PBL) being widely adopted. This study compares the effectiveness of PBL and traditional lectures in enhancing knowledge retention, critical thinking, and student engagement among medical students. Conducted at the Umanand Prasad School of Medicine & Health Sciences (UPSMHS), University of Fiji (UniFiji), from 2019 to 2022, this study involved 500 medical students. Quantitative results showed that students in the PBL group scored on average 12% higher in critical thinking assessments and demonstrated 15% greater improvement in case-based performance tasks compared to the lecture group (p < 0.05). Survey results also indicated that 78% of PBL students reported higher engagement and satisfaction with the learning process. These findings suggest that PBL promotes deeper learning and skill acquisition, while traditional lectures efficiently deliver foundational knowledge. A hybrid model integrating both approaches could foster comprehensive medical education by combining knowledge transmission with critical skill development. Such a model has significant implications for curriculum design, suggesting a move toward curricular integration and educational reform that emphasizes self-directed learning and clinical reasoning from early training stages.
Downloads
References
Abraham, R. R., Upadhya, S., & Torke, S. (2018). Student perspectives of problem-based learning in an Indian medical college. Education for Health, 31(2), 80–86.
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.
Bonham, L. A. (1991). Guglielmino’s Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale: What does it mean? Adult Education Quarterly, 41(2), 92–99. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0001848191041002003
DesMarchais, J. E. (1993). A student-centred, problem-based curriculum: 5 years’ experience. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148(9), 1567–1572. CMAJ
Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 499–567. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., Schmidt, H. G., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1994). A rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem-based curriculum: Validity and reliability. Medical Education, 28(6), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02735.x
Farmer, E. A. (2004). Faculty development for problem-based learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 8(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2003.00337.x
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Guglielmino, L. M. (1978). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 6467. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1113997
Hitchcock, M. A., & Mylona, Z.-H. (2000). Teaching faculty to conduct problem-based learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(1), 52–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1201_8
Hoban, J. D., Lawson, S. R., Mazmanian, P. E., Best, A. M., & Seibel, H. R. (2005). The self-directed learning readiness scale: A factor analysis study. Medical Education, 39(4), 370–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02140.x
Immekus, J. C., & Imbrie, P. K. (2010). A test and cross-validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire factor structure among Western university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 495–510. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0013164409355685
Kanter, S. (2008). Toward better descriptions of innovations. Academic Medicine, 83(8), 703–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181838a2c
Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model. Training & Development, 50(1), 54–57. https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1114002
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Leung, K. K., Lue, B. H., & Lee, M. B. (2003). Development of a teaching style inventory for tutor evaluation in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 37(5), 410–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01493.x
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
Downloads
Published
Check index
How to Cite
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abhijit Gogoi, Robert Bancod, Muni Nadan, Ronesh Pal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).