Students’ Perceptions of Lecture Feedback in Learning Writing at The University of Mataram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1915Abstract
Umpan balik dosen memainkan peran penting dalam mengembangkan kemampuan menulis bagi mahasiswa. Penelitian ini meneliti persepsi mahasiswa tentang umpan balik dalam proses menulis di Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Mataram. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi jenis-jenis umpan balik yang menurut mahasiswa paling bermanfaat dalam meningkatkan kemampuan menulis mereka. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara, yang dianalisis secara tematik untuk mengidentifikasi pola umum dalam preferensi dan persepsi umpan balik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa menganggap umpan balik perkuliahan penting untuk mengidentifikasi dan memperbaiki kesalahan tertentu, meningkatkan akurasi tata bahasa, dan meningkatkan kualitas tulisan secara keseluruhan. Selain itu, umpan balik secara signifikan meningkatkan motivasi dan kepercayaan diri mahasiswa selama proses penulisan. Mahasiswa lebih menyukai umpan balik yang spesifik dan langsung yang membahas kesalahan secara rinci. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya strategi umpan balik yang efektif dalam mendorong pengembangan keterampilan menulis dan menawarkan wawasan yang berharga bagi para pendidik untuk meningkatkan metode pengajaran berdasarkan kebutuhan mahasiswa.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, F., & Aziz, J.B. (2009). Students' Perception of the Lectures' Teaching of Literature Communicating and Understanding Through the Eyes of the Audience. European journal of social sciences, 7, 17-26. https://shidaedu702eportfolio.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ejss_7_3_02.pdf
Ariyani, A., & Puspitasari, D. (2017). Written corrective feedback: A narrative inquiry of writing feedback in intensive English course writing class. International Conference on Islam and Education: Charting the Future of Islamic Education for Global Harmony, 3(1). https://proceeding.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/iconie/issue/view/15
Bulqiyah, S., Mahbub, M. A., & Nugraheni, D. A. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing: Tertiary students’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.2371
Dignath, C., Veenman, M.V.J. The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 489–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and lecture development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054
Farida, M. (2022). Beliefs about feedback provision in EFL writing and actual practices by an experienced Indonesian lecturer. Volume 7(2), 2503–4405. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i2.18519
Harmer, J. (2008). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A practical research method (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Majid, A., Setyaningsih, E., & Cahyaningrum, D. (2022). Writing feedback in tertiary EFL online classroom: Indonesian students and instructor perceptions. English Education Journal, 10(2), 71–80. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/englishedu/article/view/58419
Marrs, S. (2016). Development of the students’ perceptions of writing feedback scale (Un-published Doctoral’s Dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4404
Muhammad, S., Nadeem, M., Hussain, S., & Qahar, A. (2023). Comparison of the impact of oral and written feedback on the student’s academic achievement. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10500287
Park, E. (2006). The effectiveness of lecture’s written feedback on L2 writing. Seoul National University, pp. 61–73. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/423f/85c01f490f7201b516ce5ecf744a8961b7cf.pdf
Purnomo, W. W., Basthomi, Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2021). EFL university lectures’ perspectives on written corrective feedback and their actual applications. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(3), 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21641
Saragih, N. A., Madya, S., Siregar, R. A., & Saragih, W. (2021). Written corrective feedback: Students’ perception. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8, 676–690. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1294325
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sultana, N. (2021). Impact of lectures’ feedback in improving students’ writing skills: A study of tertiary level students in Dhaka. British Journal of Arts and Humanities, pp. 129–139. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.02101280139
Tay, H. Y., & Lam, K. W. L. (2022). Students’ engagement across a typology of lecture feedback practices. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 21(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09315-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ni Made Marneta Sukreni, Arifuddin Arifuddin, Ahmad Zamzam, Untung Waluyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
