Pragmatics: A Critical Instance Analysis of Discourse Background of Iraq War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1565Keywords:
Pidato, Bentuk Linguistic, Analisis Wacana KritisAbstract
Selama dekade terakhir, terdapat banyak kontroversi seputar gagasan rumit tentang terorisme dan antiterorisme. Terorisme adalah topik yang sangat rumit dan mendominasi agenda nasional dan internasional. Bentuknya bisa bermacam-macam dan dikaitkan dengan berbagai kelompok dan alasan. Disajikan dalam berbagai cara sesuai dengan siapa yang berbicara. Dengan latar belakang tersebut, artikel ini bertujuan melakukan Analisis Wacana Kritis (CDA) terhadap pernyataan-pernyataan Bush mengenai terorisme. Ini menerapkan gagasan van Dijk tentang Analisis Wacana Kritis pada dua pidato Bush, dengan menggunakan teknik analisis isi kualitatif. Studi tersebut menemukan bahwa Bush memproyeksikan terorisme secara tidak baik, sementara memproyeksikan anti-terorisme secara positif dengan sengaja memilih terminologi dan ungkapan yang bermuatan emosi. Pernyataan Bush sering kali memuat referensi tentang kekuasaan sebagai kendali, kendali pikiran, dan kendali konteks. Penelitian ini mempunyai implikasi signifikan terhadap teori Analisis Wacana Kritis dan penelitian teroris.
Downloads
References
Apple, M. W. (1996) Cultural Politics in Education. Teachers College Press: New York.
Baker, C. D. & Freebody, P. (1989). Children's First Schoolbooks. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
Baker, C. D. Luke A (eds).(1991).Towards a Critical Sociology of Reading Pedagogy.John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Ball, S. (ed.).(1990). Foucault and Education. Routledge:New York.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and Symbolic Power. Polity Press: Cambridge.
Cazden, C .(1988). Classroom Discours. Heineman: Portsmouth, New Jersey.
Corson, D. (ed.). (1995). Discourse and Power in Educational Organizations. Hampton Press: Creskill, New Jersey.
Fairclough, N (ed.). (1992a). Critical Language Awareness.Longman: London.
Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press:Cambridge.
Foucault, M.(1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Harper and Row: New York.
Foucault,M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Pantheon: New York.
Gutierrez, C., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urb.Ed: 29, 410-442.
Hall, S. (1996). The meaning of New Times. In: Morley D, Chen K (eds) 1996 Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. Routledge, London.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., Walkerdine V 1984 Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. Methuen: London.
Kress, G. (1989). Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Lee, A. (1996). Literacy, Gender and Curriculum. Taylor and Francis: London.
Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse analysis in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Rev.Res.Ed. 21:1-48.
Luke, C., Gore J (eds).(1993). Feminism and Critical Pedagogy. Routledge:New York.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press:Minneapolis.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons. Harvard University Press, Cambridge: Mass.
Muspratt, S., Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (eds). (1997). Constructing Critical Literacies. Hampton Press:
Creskill, NJ. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Har.Ed.Rev. 66:60-92.
Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. Routledge: London.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adib Darmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
